Q Justice Not Served Exercise: Exoneration Profiles For this assignment, you will present a case from the database from the National Registry of Exonerations. In this paper, you will detail who your (hypothetical) client is, what injustices occurred, and what the government should do to correct the mistakes made. You will use the National Registry of Exonerations (NRE) for ideas of cases where justice was mostly not served. Every person listed in this registry has been formally exonerated by some court of law—so you can choose any case from this registry as your chosen client. The database lists cases where, “ a person was wrongly convicted of a crime later cleared of all the charges based on new evidence of innocence.” Browse through the cases and find a case that you find interesting and compelling! You’ll find that each exoneree has a short write up in the NRE database, but you’ll need to find more information on the individual to help you argue your case. The key to these cases is that something went wrong, procedurally, to cause the injustice to occur. You need to investigate what went wrong—sometimes it is witness misidentification, other times it is government misconduct or coercive police tactics—and discuss how this led to the miscarriage of justice. Because all of these cases have proceeded to the appellate level, there are legal documents which you can review to learn more about the case, and in particular, what went wrong. I will bring in a librarian to help you learn to access legal materials related to the case’s appellate process. Your assignment is to argue for your client. To do this, you’ll need to detail: • What this case is about, briefly • What went wrong: what injustices occurred • Cite the SPECIFIC constitutional amendment which you believe has been violated (4th, 5th, 6th, or 8th) (and cite your reasoning for choosing this amendment) (this is a KEY piece of your paper). • Cite any precedent (discussed in class, from your textbook, or in the materials you find on the particular case) that could be used to support your case for exoneration, you may cite it– even if it would not be technically allowable in court because it might be from another state. For the purposes of this exercise, you may cite it to demonstrate you understand the underlying legal concepts—even if specific idiosyncratic state rules might prohibit this in real life ?. • Explain what you think should happen to rectify the injustice. You can be creative: compensation, censure of officials involved in the case, or some other remedy. Since this is a real person but only a hypothetical argument, feel free to argue for what you believe might be appropriate in this case. What responsibility does the state have to make it right? This should be approximately 4 pages (typed, Times New Roman font, double spaced) in length. Cite all materials used in a bibliography according to APA style. Pro Tip: If you are having trouble finding additional information on the person you’ve chosen, try another exoneree where you can easily access information about them. Rubric Exoneree Rubric Exoneree Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of case specifics 3= case specifics are fully described 2= specifics are described, but some holes in the story exist as described 1= case isn't fully described or understood 3 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplanation of Constitutional Violations 3= constitutional violations were discussed fully and correctly 2= Some consitutional violations were discussed, but some parts were either missing or misfired 1-Very little was explained about constitutional violations 0= Not mentioned 3 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrecedent Cited Was precedent cited, and if so, was it cited appropriately? 1 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of citations for materials (APA or MLA) Were citations used? And if so, were they used sufficiently? 3= appropriate use of citations 2= some use of citations, but some missing pieces 1= very little use of citations, lacking 0= No citations used at all 3 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptions of Justice Did you identify what you believe justice should look like in this case, given all that has happened? If so, how well did you describe this? 3= Very strong description of what justice should look like, 2= decent description/detail, 1=not mentioned or only mentioned briefly. 2 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 2 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling/Grammar/Organization How strong were the writing/grammar/organization in this paper? 3= very strong writing/organization/grammar, 2= some strengths but some weaknesses in at least one area, 1= significant weakness in several of these areas. 3 pts Full Marks 0 pts No Marks 3 pts Total Points: 15